Connect with us

San Jose Sharks

Sharks Locker Room: Last Time We Talk About Last Year?

Published

on

Credit: Dean Tait/Sport Shots

The phrase “last year” is the new “He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named” in the San Jose Sharks organization.



For years, it was the “R-Word” or “rebuild”.

But let’s say it again, perhaps for the last time: This isn’t last year’s San Jose Sharks. This is an NHL-caliber team, which you really couldn’t say last year.

Last year, on this date, the Sharks got eviscerated by the Vancouver Canucks 10-1. Two days later, the Pittsburgh Penguins humiliated them 10-2.

This season? San Jose hosted Vancouver again…and lost 3-2 on a last-minute goal. And they outplayed the Canucks for decent portions of the game too.

It’s not just about different Nov. 2 scores or records — the Sharks were 0-9-1 after last year’s Canucks loss and 3-8-2 after this season’s — just look at the line-ups.

If you didn’t get enough frights on Halloween!

Compared to tonight?

Look, neither is a playoff-caliber roster. But it’s clear that GM Mike Grier’s efforts to field a more competitive roster, highlighted by the additions of Tyler Toffoli, Alex Wennberg, Barclay Goodrow, Carl Grundstrom, Jake Walman, and Cody Ceci…it’s working.

“Moving in the right direction,” the always candid Nico Sturm, who’s seen plenty of losing with the San Jose Sharks over the last couple of seasons, said.

This is illustrated by Sturm’s goal, which came off a spirited forecheck by the third line of Goodrow, Luke Kunin, and Will Smith. Then the fourth line, Sturm flanked by Grundstrom and Danil Gushchin cleaned up.

In particular, Grier focused on bettering the forward depth, including the bottom-six, with more compete and attentive two-way forwards. The improvements have been noticeable, especially a far more persistent forecheck than last year’s consistent one-and-done FC. A good forecheck sets the table for the rest of team — it takes pressure off the defense and the goaltending.

“That’s definitely something that’s been very noticeable, that our forechecks have been very effective,” Sturm said.

Mikael Granlund also scored for San Jose.

Of course, the bottom-six helped lose the game too — they weren’t stellar on either of Vancouver’s second and third goals. But for most of the night, they were actually better than the team’s top lines — the Sharks wouldn’t have been this close without them.

You couldn’t say that last year. And soon, I guess we won’t be talking about last year so much anymore.

The Sharks are headed in the right direction, it’s just a long road to get where they want to go.

Ryan Warsofsky

Warsofsky, on what the San Jose Sharks can learn from tonight:

In certain situations, we have to understand what is going on in the hockey game. What is going on in the hockey game. We cannot have brain lapses that we have, line changes that we have, puck play that we have & think we’re going to win hockey games in this league.

On both goals, really, awful change. They probably could have scored on the breakaway where they hit the post, we come back, we turn over another puck. Under a minute, we have some veteran guys out there that need to understand what’s going on in the game, and we turn over a puck again.

It’s digging in more, being more being more competitive in those situations. Focus level has got to go up. So we got to learn from it.

Warsofsky, on Liljegren’s Sharks’ debut:

Lily was good. He did some things, moved some pucks. Obviously, hasn’t played a lot of hockey, so I’m sure he’ll get better as the games go on.

Warsofsky, on the Sharks’ forecheck:

When we put pucks where we can get them on the forecheck, [then] we have a good forecheck, we sustain O-zone pressure. But when we give pucks [to their] goaltender, and we don’t put pucks where they need to so we can forecheck them is where we get into trouble, and for whatever reason, we can’t figure that out yet.

Warsofsky, on Ethan Cardwell and Danil Gushchin, who flip-flopped lines:

I thought both of them actually were pretty solid tonight. Obviously, Cards, a couple of reads without the puck that need to improve. The game picks up at certain moments that he’ll have to develop some of those habits. I thought Goosh had poise with the puck and was trying to the right things, being more physical.

Timothy Liljegren

Liljegren, on his first game in a while, and how long it’ll take him to feel comfortable:

Thought it was okay. Haven’t played for a long while, a long time now, so just try and go out there and play simple, hard, and get my legs back and get up to game speed.

Probably take a couple of more games for me to feel like myself again.

Jake Walman

Walman, on leaving the game after an awkward Brock Boeser hit:

Yeah, it was a hard hit. I have to protect myself better. It’s a rough sport.

Walman, on what happened on the Canucks’ game-winner:

I got to take control of that play and be closer on my guy. Obviously, my guy put it in the net, and that’s on me. I got to be better there. Hold myself accountable, and that’s just the standard that we got to go by. We can’t be letting that stuff slide.

Nico Sturm

Sturm, on how San Jose Sharks can improve:

We made a couple of, I would call mental errors, communication errors. There’s a tough change coming off of that power play.

I’d have to watch it again, but never really want to change in the neutral zone when they have the puck. They quick up it on us. They get a [breakaway], we’re all out of sorts.

I thought we played a really good game for the most part, against a really, really good hockey team, we got to mention that too, right? So yeah, it’s frustrating.

 

10 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Douglas Fowler

really good video on the shot of will smith, sharing

https://youtu.be/EcIURz2uczg?si=K28YG9QumxS4KQbu

Ty Comes

Awesome! Love Demers and Rupper, didn’t know Demers was working for NHL now, he’s perfect there wow, great chemistry

BurnsiesBeard

This one stung a little. Possibly because they’ve been on a winning streak and also because this one felt so damn winnable. The mistakes that led to goals were glaring and this whole “get a goal, give one up in less than a minute” thing they have going on is genuinely frustrating to watch as a fan.

Ty Comes

I was so pissed lol. That said – def like the direction they’re trending

Zeke

The turnover is enormous. This is where the Sharks are in their rebuild. Trying to find pieces. The biggest issue the Sharks have — not trying to rush the rebuild. Lotta discussion about moving Granlund. Look, the Sharks shouldn’t give him away, but the team already has 2 contracts for guys in their 30’s now that run for multiple seasons past this one (Goodrow, Toffoli). They’ll likely want to extend Walman in his age 30 season. This needs to be a team which skews very young. Yes, need some vets to help the players develop. But this is about making… Read more »

Erick

Yeah, I’m torn. It all comes down to what Granny decides to do, really. If he wants to stick around, I think he brings a lot of value to the growth of the young guns.

The way he goes out there and pushes himself to the limit to make something happen and tries to take the game over (successfully), reminds me of Couture at his prime as Captain. Teaching that grit to these young pups would be invaluable.

But then, he could really want to contend now so if he decides to move, it’ll happen.

Joseph

Assuming Granlund is looking for 4+ years, I agree in theory. But two or three, that’s a different decision. Because yes, the goal is to be a great team in 2028. But that’s going to be hard to accomplish if the Sharks aren’t a good team in 2026, which will require more than one or two veterans to insulate a very, very young group. One area a lot of teams make mistakes when they’re rebuilding is trying to ice a roster that is made up of young, productive players and declining veterans. You also need veterans who can contribute every… Read more »

SJShorky

I just can’t see Granny taking a 3 year deal the way he’s playing unless the Sharks overpay a ton. Has to be at least 4 years likely 7mil, maybe more. His agent will likely advise against anything less.

Joseph

Maybe. We really don’t know what the player wants, which ultimately matters most. Plenty of players take below market value or shorter term to stay in a situation they enjoy. Granlund is playing amazing hockey, but there are still a multitude of factors working against him on the open market. He’s a smaller center. He’s had issues adjusting to new environments in the past. He’ll be 33. He’s never won, and has fairly limited playoff experience. And at his current pace, he’d be coming off a career year that outstripped his previous best by 20-30 points. Those are all things… Read more »

SJShorky

They don’t typically take less in this situation. Last big contract, maybe having a career year… this is a last opportunity at generational wealth. Sure teams will be nervous for the reasons you mention but it only takes 2 teams to create a bidding war. Look at Tavares. 4 years of term should put him out of the Sharks contention. There are more than a few teams who will have cap space and want to make a significant signing. Remember when Kevin Hayes got 7(?) per year (I think?). Everyone and their mother knew that was a stupid contract when… Read more »

Last edited 3 days ago by SJShorky

Sheng’s Travel Fund

Help fund Sheng's travel! Every dollar goes to the cost of getting to and from Sharks road games.


Click here to contribute to Sheng's travel pool!

Get SJHN in your inbox!

Enter your email address to get all of our articles delivered directly to your inbox.

Hockey Shots

Extra Hour Hockey Training

Cathy’s Power Skating

Sharks Team & Cap Info

Meta