Connect with us

San Jose Sharks

BREAKING: Sharks Don’t Qualify Donato, Merkley

Published

on

As expected, Ryan Donato will not receive a qualifying offer from the San Jose Sharks.

The RFA’s QO would’ve been $2.15 million dollars. Instead, it appears that San Jose will allow the 25-year-old winger to enter unrestricted free agency on Jul. 28.

There is a chance, albeit unlikely, that the Sharks will re-sign Donato to a lower figure than his QO before then.

The San Jose Sharks also declined to qualify their newest acquisition, Nick Merkley, but the Sharks and Merkley are expected to reach a new contract agreement. Merkley’s qualifying offer was $874,125.

How Can Nick Merkley Help Sharks?

San Jose has qualified RFA Noah Gregor, while Arizona previously qualified Adin Hill. Hill is expected to command a sizable increase over his $800,000 QO.

Hill’s Cap Hit Will Probably Be Higher Than Expected

The big news here is Donato.

The winger came to San Jose via Minnesota — for a 2021 third-round draft pick — with high expectations. There were hopes that he could establish himself as a top-six winger, but his playing time under Bob Boughner decreased every month.

That third-round pick sent to the Wild, by the way, was eventually re-routed to Edmonton and became 90th pick Luca Munzenberger.

Donato notched six goals and 14 assists in 50 games. In January, Donato averaged 14:55 Per Game, 13:53 in February, 12:24 in March, 11:19 in April, and 7:12 in May.

Boughner elaborated in his exit interview: “Everybody knows he’s got a great offensive skill-set. He can help you from the top of circles down. I think it’s the other part of the game that he struggles with from time to time.

“As the season went on, guys get worn down and they slow down a bit.

“It was a matter of him being able to stick to the details, help us out that way.

“But the one thing about Ryan, he can help any team because of his offense. He’s good in front of the net on the power play. He’s a guy that loves coming to the rink, he’s a great teammate, and all those things.

“We just got to get the details of his game just a little better. When you’re playing against top-end players, if you want to be a top-six guy, you gotta be responsible in all areas of the ice, and that’s sort of what we talked about.”

However, other organizations might not be as down on Donato as the San Jose Sharks are.

“It should’ve been a fit,” an NHL scout told San Jose Hockey Now. “He had the opportunity to play with different centers. He wasn’t able to bust down the door.

“But he can shoot the puck. He’s a pretty good player who may find his way somewhere else.”

Another NHL scout shared this nuanced opinion: “He’s more of an individually talented player, but lacks overall speed to do it on his own. And he’s not talented enough to get by like that. He doesn’t make his linemates better.”

Welcome to your new home for San Jose Sharks breaking news, analysis and opinion. Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and don't forget to subscribe to SJHN+ for all of our members-only content from Sheng Peng and the National Hockey Now network plus an ad-free browsing experience.
19 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
whiskerz

No QO for Merkley is surprising, but maybe they give him a one-way deal at a lower cap hit instead

david barnard

bingo! he’s got to be 1 of the depth F’s DW talked about adding.

so, Sharks have 9.503333M in cap space. 750k for Merkley leaves 8.753333k. have to sigh Hill. let’s hope that’s max 3x3M, leaving 5M and change. they’re most likely holding pat with Jones as backup/split time. they’ve got money to spend on a quality F.

Last edited 1 month ago by david barnard
david barnard

well, now they have even more cap space to play with, lol!

david barnard

that QO figure was lower than CF’s tool had it. we’ve been consistently off, so i wonder how/where you get your numbers? i always use CF. are you factoring in the bump they get? Merkley’s base was $874,125 last season, so he gets the 105% of base bump (greater than 660k, but less than 1M). per CF, that’s his QO is $917,831. it’s moot now, since he’s a UFA (no QO).

david barnard

his 2020-21 1-yr deal base was the 874.125k figure. 105% of that was the 917.831k figure.

david barnard

i just wanted to know what you were using because every time i put a QO out, you’d write an article and the numbers were different. i was getting paranoid, lol!

david barnard

these are the top pending (unsigned) RFA forwards: Bertuzzi (26 RFA): projected contract = 1×3.086M. 37% confidence on term. per EW. Buchnevich (26 RFA): projected contract = 5×6.223M. 32% confidence on term per EW. Fiala (25 RFA): projected contract = 5×6.111M. 30% confidence on term per EW. Laine (23 RFA): projected contract = 2×4.537M. 26% confidence on term per EW. Tkachuk (21 RFA): projected contract = 6×6.467M. 29% confidence on term per EW. Svechnikov (21 RFA): projected contract = 4×6.175M. 24% confidence on term per EW. Petterson (22 RFA): projected contracted = 2×4.953M. 27% confidence on term per EW. Reinhart… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by david barnard
david barnard

these are the top pending (unsigned) UFA forwards: Bonino (33 UFA): proj. contract = 2×2.552M (34% confidence) Landeskog (28 UFA): proj. contract = 7×8.791M (45% confidence) Ovechkin (35 UFA): proj. contract = 3×7.507M (41% confidence) Danault (28 UFA): proj. contract = 7×6.236M (23% confidence) Hoffman (31 UFA): proj. contract = 5×5.65M (31% confidence) Saad (28 UFA): proj. contract = 4×4.944M (46% confidence) Schwartz (29 UFA): proj. contract = 3×4.757M (25% confidence) Coleman (29 UFA): proj. contract = 4×4.698M (36% confidence) Krejci (35 UFA): proj. contract = 2×4.688M (33% confidence) Palmieri (30 UFA): proj. contract = 3×4.219M (30% confidence) Foligno (33… Read more »

JumprockJ

He doesn’t make his linemates better, oof! That’s harsh. Drawing penalties and shootouts are his best attributes.

david barnard

pretty much confirmed here. Leonard, Gambrell, and PM were his most common LM.

Screenshot_2021-07-26 S J 2021 Donato With-or-Without You.png
Last edited 1 month ago by david barnard
Alaskan_ice

Sheng, what is your thought on retaining Donato on a lesser contract? Does he want to be here? Could it still work here??

[…] BREAKING: Sharks Don’t Qualify Donato, Merkley […]

[…] Jose: The San Jose Sharks did not qualify forward Ryan Donato, who is now a free agent. He could be of interest to a number of […]

[…] — Surprisingly, San Jose did not qualify Ryan Donato.(SJHN)  […]

Sheng’s Travel Fund

Help fund Sheng's travel! Every dollar goes to the cost of getting to and from Sharks road games.


Click here to contribute to Sheng's travel pool!

Get SJHN in your inbox!

Enter your email address to get all of our articles delivered directly to your inbox.

Sharks Team & Cap Info

SJHN on Facebook

All the San Jose Sharks news that's fit to print

Enter your email to get the best Sharks coverage delivered straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.