San Jose Sharks
Preview/Lines #58: Warsofsky on How Analytics Affect Sharks’ Line Construction
Ryan Warsofsky gave a perhaps unexpected reason for opting for Kiefer Sherwood over Collin Graf on the Macklin Celebrini line.
The line of San Jose Sharks youngsters, Celebrini, Graf, and Will Smith, has been a fan favorite. But?
“If you look at the analytics, that line is not as good as everyone says it was. If you really look into the numbers,” Warsofsky said on Sunday. “You watch the eye test, yeah, they score a couple goals, and that’s what everyone sees. But there’s also some deficiencies with that line together. Doesn’t mean we won’t try it again, at some point.”
What analytics were lagging?
“Expected goals for and goals against, I would say the biggest thing,” Warsofsky said. “Puck possession would be another one. I’m not going to go through the long, long list of everything we go through, but I would say that’s the biggest ones.”
Per Natural Stat Trick, Graf-Celebrini-Smith at 5-on-5 had a 40.38 Expected Goals For % and 41.18 Corsi For %. Just for comparison, Celebrini’s most regular line this season is with Smith and Tyler Toffoli, a trio that sports a 46.88 xGF % and 47.27 CF %. Small sample size, but Smith-Celebrini-Sherwood has excelled in these categories with a 57.6 xGF % and 54.43 CF %.
Keep in mind, Natural Stat Trick is just a decent thumbnail for public consumption. Warsofsky and the San Jose Sharks might use different and/or private xGF models for their evaluations.
Interestingly too, Toffoli-Celebrini-Smith blows away Graf-Celebrini-Smith in counting stats, with a 73.91 Goals For % versus the latter’s 57.1 %.
Anyway, Warsofsky is more than just peripherally aware of hockey analytics.
In that case, why does he keep leaning on, for example, his regular fourth line of Barclay Goodrow-Zack Ostapchuk-Ryan Reaves, 40.11 xGF % and 43.11 CF %?
“If you look at it, some lines are doing well in expected goals for, goals against. Some lines that are good possession lines. There’s good [creating turnovers] line. I mean, you can go through [a lot],” Warsofsky said. “There’s a rabbit hole you can go down through with analytics. Doesn’t mean we make our decision solely on analytics.”
Ryan Warsofsky has called his fourth line, led by Goodrow and Reaves, and centered mostly by Ostapchuk or Adam Gaudette, his “identity” line. That’s obviously not an analytics term, but it does give lots of insight into what this head coach values.
In the construction of a line-up, Warsofsky might have a line designated to drive play more. Another to match up against the opponent’s best players. Another to forecheck and create turnovers. And another for “identity”.
“Yeah, sometimes, yeah,” Warsofsky said. “I think there’s a lot of eye test that needs to pass from the coaches and myself, and then there’s trust that goes with certain players in certain situations.”
He added: “It’s match-ups. There’s an array of reasons for certain lines and certain lines that we like, certain lines we want to see. Obviously, we wanted Wennberg to match up against McDavid [yesterday]. So it really depends game-to-game.”
San Jose Sharks (28-25-4)
Alex Nedeljkovic will start, otherwise, the Sharks will line up the same as yesterday:
Smith-Celebrini-Sherwood
Kurashev-Wennberg-Graf
Eklund-Misa-Toffoli
Goodrow-Ostapchuk-Regenda
Orlov-Klingberg
Ferraro-Mukhamadullin
Dickinson-Desharnais
Nedeljkovic
Winnipeg Jets (23-26-9)
Welcome back, Walker Duehr!
Connor-Scheifele-Vilardi
Perfetti-Lowry-Iafallo
Nyquist-Toews-Duehr
Koepke-Barron-Pearson
Stanley-DeMelo
Samberg-Salomonsson
Fleury-Schenn
Hellebuyck
Where To Watch
Puck drop between the San Jose Sharks and Winnipeg Jets is at 1 PM PT at SAP Center. Watch it live on NBC Sports California. Listen to it on the Sharks Audio Network.




In Celebrini’s media time once he got back someone asked him about maybe facing Hellebuyck today and he gave kind of a weird answer like he knew he wouldn’t face him today because Hellebuyck was going to take some time off.
I wonder what that was about.
Hellebuyck said he was going to take some extra rest when he got back from the Olympics. He didn’t play a game or two once he returned back from Milan, but will play today.
I think at the time he was asked about it, Celebrini was probably under the impression he may not be playing against him today for that reason.
There’s some parts of the analytics that we don’t really go into or dive into the context of like I think with the 4th line, at one point in the season, they had the lowest xGA per CA against so by that perspective, it would appear that they were the best defensively even though by volume, they get caved in the most.
I feel like that probably would have more to do with the quality of competition against than their own defensive ability. In general I’d guess bottom 6 players are less efficient at turning shot attempts into expected goals. Probably influenced as well by how they play in the d-zone. Reaves in particular I’ve noticed plays very passive in the defensive zone.
I don’t disagree but I think it sheds some light on the coaching perspective when it looks like you got a line that seems to limit dangerous shots in their own zone when they’re out there. Even if it’s against softer competition.
Is Regenda wasted on that 4th line?
4th line is often a thankless job. Coach puts you out to handle defensive zone faceoffs to keep his top lines fresh. The only O zone time they get is whatever they create themselves.
Anthem singer screwed up the Canadian anthem today. Very early on in it she just said “From sea to shining sea” instead of the correct line. Not sure but I think it was instead of the True Patriot love line. She did a decent job covering for it when there was a chance it could have thrown her all off. Just as I was thinking “Wait, what?” she got the same look on her face on the jumbotron. That’s when it could have all fallen apart but she shook it off and just said an actual line from the Canadian… Read more »
analytics is important but smith/celebrini had best games in last 10 perhaps to drive the line vs EDM. You can put other guys and they will convert the chances sherwood missed. it’s been 4 games and sherwood does not have a point despite top mins and pp1 time. That’s data for you. Smith has lower XFG% with Macklin vs all other forwards also. If they go analytics you might want to take Smith off and go back to Cherny and Graf with Mackie. today vs WPG, they went back to Graf and Sherwood fell to 3rd line again. most teams… Read more »