Connect with us

San Jose Sharks

SPECULATION: Are Sharks Interested in Puljujarvi?

Published

on

Credit: AP Photo/Jeff Chiu

It sounds like Jesse Puljujarvi has played his last game in Edmonton.

According to Mark Spector of Sportsnet, both Puljujarvi and the Oilers are ready to go their separate ways.

“Puljujarvi is deemed ‘a play killer’ inside the Oilers dressing room, it is believed, where two of the best centremen in the world have not been enough to turn Puljujarvi into a legitimate Top 6 winger in the NHL,” Spector wrote. “The puck dies on his stick in the offensive zone too often to continue to saddle Connor McDavid or Leon Draisaitl with such a winger on a regular basis.”

From Puljujarvi’s perspective, he might be unhappy with his role. Before the All-Star break, the 2016 fourth-overall pick was averaging 17:10 a night. Afterwards, his minutes dropped to 14:44 a game, and he was a spare part in Edmonton’s playoff run, barely clearing 10 minutes a contest.

All this cast a shadow on Puljujarvi’s solid statistical campaign, as the 24-year-old set a career high with 36 points in 65 games. The winger is also an analytics darling.

On the surface, Puljujarvi does look like an attractive get for the Sharks. They need to improve their forward group, he’s got upside, and the pending RFA doesn’t appear like he’ll cost San Jose a ton in terms of assets or with his new contract.

“San Jose may also be a destination,” Spector speculated, “though with the Sharks in the process of hiring a new GM, that could complicate a process both sides hope to wrap up prior to next Thursday’s draft.”

According to Spector’s sources, Puljujarvi might cost just a second or third-round pick. That’s a far cry from going fourth-overall in 2016, and that relatively-low valuation created some online controversy.

However, San Jose Hockey Now reached out to two NHL scouts, who agreed with that valuation for Puljujarvi.

One scout agreed with the Sportsnet assertion that the “puck dies on his stick in the offensive zone too often.”

Another noted that while Puljujarvi has a good shot, he questions the winger’s hockey sense.

“The problem with him is that you’re not sure which player you’re getting? The first half, he was pretty effective with McDavid and playing on the top two lines, but he lost himself in the second half. So I don’t know who you’re getting?” the scout mused. “He’s still young and has potential, I see a player, but I just don’t know what’s between his ears and that’s the research you’d have to do.

“He’s showing that he’s a bottom-six player and not a top-six player.”

The scout added of the 6-foot-4 winger: “For a big man with skills, he’s not a real good checker, and he’s not physical at all.”

So if Puljujarvi isn’t scoring, is he helping you? And does he score enough to neglect other areas of his game?

The Finn forward is talented, but a more apt comparison, honestly, might be a better Ryan Donato. The San Jose Sharks took a swing on the offensively-minded Donato in the off-season of 2020, sending out a third-round pick to the Minnesota Wild for the then 24-year-old winger.

Donato didn’t work out with the San Jose Sharks, scoring just six goals in 50 games in 2020-21, but he did find his footing a little with the Seattle Kraken last year, notching 16 goals on a veteran’s minimum contract.

Welcome to your new home for San Jose Sharks breaking news, analysis and opinion. Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and don't forget to subscribe to SJHN+ for all of our members-only content from Sheng Peng and the National Hockey Now network plus an ad-free browsing experience.
11 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alaskan_ice

Draft picks are always nice but never a guarantee. Pulujarvi has NHL time, as did Donato and I wanted Donato here. I would like to see Pulujarvi in teal. Give them a pick and see how it works out.

Gary Caldwell

SJ has no second round pick this year, and I’m not sure they’d want to part with a second in ’23? Third round this year and offer him 2 x $1.75M AAV?

The obvious reservations with Puljujarvi are plays dying on the end of his stick and apparent lack of physical play for a guy his size. SJ has had their fair share of plays dying on the stick guys; Sorensen, Melker, Gregor. Would they really want to bring in a player with that rep? However, he’d be an upgrade over many players on the 2022 SJ roster.

Brian

Not if the pick is higher than a 4th rounder. I’ve never been impressed with any aspect of his game when i see him play. He’s very limited game and gives inconsistent effort.. Who cares if he is a former top-5 pick. He’s not even very good in a 3rd line role because he doesn’t even utilize his size to his advantage and can’t always get his effort in gear. There’s something amiss, mentally with this kid. Advanced stats nerds like him but they don’t reflect close to the full value of a player.

david barnard

they need a goalie, so trade 1 of our surplus “nhl starters” for him and keep the pick.

Gary Caldwell

I had thought of a straight up player for player trade. The question with that scenario is, “which GT are you willing to part with?”. My choice might be Hill to EDM over Reimer based on Hill’s unavailability this past season.

david barnard

i don’t really care all that much. Hill or Reimer over Kahk.

david barnard

sure, throw 1 of the late rounds picks in, they’ve got like 6 of them from the 5th on…

The Shark

They can take Reimer & give us a pick 2nd-3rd round or so with Puljujarvi as a throw in.

Sheng’s Travel Fund

Help fund Sheng's travel! Every dollar goes to the cost of getting to and from Sharks road games.


Click here to contribute to Sheng's travel pool!

Get SJHN in your inbox!

Enter your email address to get all of our articles delivered directly to your inbox.

Hockey Shots

Extra Hour Hockey Training

Cathy’s Power Skating

Sharks Team & Cap Info

SJHN on Facebook

All the San Jose Sharks news that's fit to print

Enter your email to get the best Sharks coverage delivered straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.