Connect with us

San Jose Sharks

EXCLUSIVE: Ferraro’s Agent Says “Mario Would Like to Stay Long-Term” with Sharks

Published

on

Credit: AP Photo/Mark Humphrey

The San Jose Sharks love Mario Ferraro and Ferraro loves San Jose.

The Sharks named the 23-year-old alternate captain before this season, an impressive feat for a player in just his third season in San Jose.

“Mario is that connector between [the young guys and the old guys],” San Jose Sharks head coach Bob Boughner said then. “For a young team, you need a leader like Mario where the young guys feel comfortable going to him with things. It’s just a perfect choice.”

Ferraro also happens be one of just seven 23-or-under defensemen who average over 23 minutes a night. At 23:29, he’s in league with Quinn Hughes, Adam Fox, Rasmus Dahlin, Miro Heiskanen, Cale Makar, and Jakob Chychrun.

That’s a pretty impressive resume for a third-year defenseman who’s about to become a restricted free agent.

So what should the San Jose Sharks pay Mario Ferraro?

Well, first things first: Ferraro wants to stay. Ferraro’s agent Peter Wallen told San Jose Hockey Now today, “Mario would like to stay long-term with the Sharks.”

He also added that the Sharks haven’t opened up contract negotiations yet.

What that contract will look like might be murky.

It’s actually hard to find a comp for Ferraro — there haven’t been a lot of defensive defensemen who have played as much as the impending RFA has in the last season of an entry-level contract. The key word is “defensive” — Hughes, Fox, Dahlin, Heiskanen, Makar, and Chychrun are certainly more offensively-oriented.

So obviously, Ferraro isn’t commanding Fox (seven years, $66.5) or Hughes (six years, $47.1 million) money, for example.

But don’t discount Mario Ferraro’s value either: Interestingly, another Wallen client might provide a framework for a long-term extension that would be fair for Ferraro.

In Oct. 2014, the Minnesota Wild re-signed 21-year-old Jonas Brodin, entering the final year of his ELC, to a six-year, $25 million dollar contract. Like Ferraro, Brodin played a lot (24:10 in the last year of his ELC) and didn’t score much (0.24 Points Per Game for the duration of his ELC). Ferraro, by the way, is at 0.25 PPG for his career right now.

Brodin’s $4,166,667 cap hit was 6.04 percent of the-then $69 million dollar salary cap. So what’s six percent of next year’s 82.5 million dollar cap?

That’s about five million dollars. So does a six-year, $30 million dollar extension sound reasonable for Ferraro? The San Jose Sharks would also be getting two of Ferraro UFA years too, which Minnesota didn’t gain in the Oct. 2014 Brodin pact.

Ferraro’s teammate Marc-Edouard Vlasic might also provide an instructive comp.

In Aug. 2008, the San Jose Sharks re-signed the shutdown defenseman, entering the final year of his ELC, to a four-year, $12.4 million agreement. That was 5.47 percent of a then-$56.7 million salary cap.

That would be, in today’s dollars, roughly a four-year, $18 million dollar extension. If the 23-year-old Ferraro were to sign such a pact, that would take him right up to unrestricted free agency.

Locking up Mario Ferraro will surely be one of the San Jose Sharks’ priorities in the coming months, along with settling impending UFA Tomas Hertl’s situation. Alexander Barabanov and Andrew Cogliano are San Jose’s other significant UFAs, while Jonathan Dahlen and Jake Middleton are the key RFAs.

Welcome to your new home for San Jose Sharks breaking news, analysis and opinion. Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and don't forget to subscribe to SJHN+ for all of our members-only content from Sheng Peng and the National Hockey Now network plus an ad-free browsing experience.
8 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alaskan_ice

I’m hoping that they can sign Mario. That he wants to be here is always music to my ears.
When he was drafted, many were vocal about it. He’s proven to be all that and more. These are the kind of players to hold onto.

Go Sharks!!

Zeke

6 years at $5million is fair to all. So is 4 years at $4.5m per. Been very critical of Sharks contracts in recent years, but if this is where it lands, everyone gets what they want. That said, how things settle with Kane might dictate what the Sharks can do — and when they can do it.

Whiskerz

All this ^^
If Sharks are indeed free and clear from the Kane contract, I would bet we see Mario and Hertl contracts announced a week or two later

david barnard

they aren’t going to be “free and clear”. you can bet they will be getting hosed after the League appeared to have shat itself/reversed itself once the NHLPA filed grievance.

david barnard

he’s got 1 year til arbitration rights kick in. they could also bridge him if the term+$ isn’t right. i’m wary of throwing big deals to players perhaps playing above their real talent on shitty teams, and Ferraro has arguably logged a lot of minutes playing on the worst versions of the Sharks over the last decade+. he’s on pace for 21-ish points playing top pair w/arguably 1 of the most prolific points producers from the blue line all time. he’s not racking up a lot of PP time or points tbf, but then again, if he had more offensive… Read more »

david barnard

here’s the 3-yr RAPM visual comparison to Lindgren.

Screenshot 2022-02-08 at 14-10-47 Evolving-Hockey com RAPM Charts.png
Gary To

He’s not having a very good year, mainly being asked to do too much imho. I think he will be fine in a couple of years.

AlphaK

Hoping he extends!

Last edited 6 months ago by AlphaK

Sheng’s Travel Fund

Help fund Sheng's travel! Every dollar goes to the cost of getting to and from Sharks road games.


Click here to contribute to Sheng's travel pool!

Get SJHN in your inbox!

Enter your email address to get all of our articles delivered directly to your inbox.

Hockey Shots

Extra Hour Hockey Training

Cathy’s Power Skating

Sharks Team & Cap Info

SJHN on Facebook

All the San Jose Sharks news that's fit to print

Enter your email to get the best Sharks coverage delivered straight to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.